Is Your Organization Ready For the Great Wealth Transfer A little over two decades ago, I attended a professional training course titled Managing a Multi-Generational Workforce. As a newly minted young manager of a team ranging in age from the early 20s to the late 60s, it was eye-opening to learn that these different generations needed different managerial styles. Fast forward to today, and this is also true for our multi-generational donors. You’ve all heard that today’s philanthropic landscape is marked by a paradox: while total charitable dollars are hitting record highs, the number of individual donors is shrinking almost across the board. At the same time, we are experiencing a historic wealth transfer in this country. That transfer amounts to approximately $84 trillion from the Silent Generation and Baby Boomers to Gen X, Millennials, and Gen Z. This isn’t just a financial shift; it’s a cultural evolution that demands a multi-pronged strategy to engage different donor mindsets. That is, if you care about major gifts. Engaging Boomers and the Silent Generation Despite the rising influence of younger generations, Baby Boomers remain the foundation of American giving, accounting for roughly 43% of total donations. These donors often care more about institutional loyalty than anything else. They believe in the mission of the medical center, the university, the church, or the local grassroots organization as an established entity. To attract and retain these donors, Legacy and Planned Giving should be a priority. Older donors are increasingly focused on estate planning. Perhaps think about offering multi-generational stewardship sessions, bringing heirs into the room to discuss family legacies. This group of donors also values traditional signs of appreciation and high-touch recognition. Think handwritten notes, personal calls, and meetings with leadership. These remain powerful tools for maintaining trust and loyalty. Finally, consider tax-efficient vehicles. Educate older donors about strategies like Qualified Charitable Distributions that can fulfill Required Minimum Distributions from IRAs. Engaging Millennials and Gen Z On the other side of this wealth transfer are “Next-Gen” donors who usually see philanthropy as activism and systems change rather than just charity. They tend to be issue-focused rather than institution-focused donors. A Gen Z donor is more likely to be influenced by a trendy social media campaign or a friend’s recommendation than by a traditional gala, golf tournament, or annual fund mailer. To capture this emerging wealth with the next generation of philanthropists, we must adapt. Younger donors prefer honest transparency; generally, they don’t want a glossy annual report; they want real-time data and behind-the-scenes access to data and leadership. They often track the results of every organization they support and expect proof of impact. These donors also want flexible, creative giving tools such as mobile giving, peer-to-peer platforms, and membership models. Conclusion: The Need for a Multi-Pronged Approach The lesson from that management course twenty years ago holds true today: success lies in meeting people where they are. The organizations that thrive in these times will be those that refuse to prioritize one generation over another but work to attract investment from both by customizing cultivation and stewardship practices for not just specific generations but also specific donors. Large organizations have the resources to segment their marketing, but smaller nonprofits can be more agile and inventive—perhaps using AI to personalize stewardship for older donors while maintaining a scrappy, authentic social presence for younger ones. One thing that hasn’t changed at all is the goal: to avoid transactional giving and to build philanthropic partnerships. Whether it’s a handwritten note to a donor in their 80s or a raw, impact-focused iPhone video for a donor in their 20s, the message must stay consistent: You, Mr. or Ms. Donor, are important to us; you are the lifeblood of the organization. |
AI: The Intern You Didn’t Know You Needed
David King says to hire this intern. “The best advice in this article is to ‘treat AI like your intern.’ This means it can provide a solid starting point, but you need to review, personalize, and correct any mistakes. A recipe for disaster is simply plugging a request into AI and blindly trusting that the output is accurate and high-quality. There are countless (and increasing daily) examples of AI generating false information. Also, you’ll notice that the tone is very neutral, and if you’re writing a request for funds, you might want to add more emotion to effectively convey your message.” |
Using AI technology for grant seeking provides big advantages. However, it also involves some risks. Select tools that are trustworthy and capable of clearly showing what makes your nonprofit special. To protect sensitive data, experts suggest using the paid version of AI platforms and reviewing their privacy policies before diving in.
Consider AI your digital intern.
At this stage of its development, AI writes about as well as an entry-level employee or intern, so you can depend on it for the first draft of a letter of interest or grant proposal. Like an intern, you’ll always need to review its work and correct mistakes to help improve future output. Especially when it comes to making a good first impression with funders, careless errors can hurt your reputation.
Use AI for prospect research.
With the right prompts, AI becomes a useful tool for researching new grant opportunities. Subscription-based tools can help identify foundations that award grants to organizations like yours. The benefit of using AI instead of a traditional search engine is that you can upload information about your mission, giving it a deeper understanding of your programs. This step results in a more targeted list of prospects, guiding you toward institutional funders actively seeking to support your work.
Train it on your organization’s data and voice.
The newest tools can learn to write like you. Most let you upload your past applications or other materials, such as your branding or written content, which help the AI understand your style. Your mission statement, annual reports, fundraising appeals, and social media posts are also valuable resources for AI training. These writing samples are stored in a “bank” you can access when creating a new letter of interest or grant proposal.
Weigh the cost savings against the drawbacks.
While nonprofits generally spend between $5,000 and $10,000 per grant to write, AI could roughly cut that cost in half. Although AI can save labor, widespread use of the technology might flood foundations with applications, unintentionally creating challenges for both sides. If AI tools enable nonprofits to apply to twice as many grants, foundations will be burdened with twice as many applications to review, and they will likely find ways to use AI to filter them out.
Skip the AI occasionally.
Even if your organization doesn’t have an official policy to govern AI use, think carefully about what you hope to get from these tools. It’s just about setting your own framework for when and why to use AI.
More here.
Foundation Giving Report
Jaci Thiede says stay the course. ![]() “Unfortunately, or fortunately, depending on your perspective…there is nothing too revealing or earth-shattering in this report. But importantly, I don’t think there is anything negative. I’d still advise non-profits to stay the course and continue diversifying their revenue streams to avoid overly relying on government grants and/or private foundations. It will be interesting to see how trends change or stay the same in 2026.” |
According to Foundation Source’s 2025 Report on Private Philanthropy, grantmaking by private foundations saw a 4.2% year-over-year increase in 2024.
1. 2024 foundation giving increased 4.2%.
In 2024, the 1,136 private foundations analyzed in the report awarded 4.2% more in grant dollars overall, with a 13.6% jump among midsize foundations with assets between $10 million and $100 million.
2. Payout rates rose among smaller foundations, fell among larger ones.
In 2025, several foundations announced they were utilizing their endowments more actively and increasing payout rates in response to the evolving funding landscape. In December, at least 35 philanthropies signed CHANGE Philanthropy’s Level Up pledge to boost their grantmaking budgets by 20% or more or to raise payout rates to 8% or higher for at least two fiscal years. The foundations in the report had an average payout rate of 7.1% in 2024, the same as in 2023.
3. Funders may be leaning into general operating support grants.
Of the 2024 grants analyzed, 40.3% were for general operating support (GOS), up slightly from 37.1% in 2023. Smaller foundations awarded a higher proportion of GOS grants (49.4%) than midsize (42.6%) or larger foundations (26.9%).
4. Giving to non-501(c)(3) entities grew in 2024.
In 2024, the number of gifts to non-501(c)(3) entities fell from 462 to 355, but the total dollar amount rose from 39 million to $51 million.
5. Digital tools could boost giving in 2026 from younger donors.
Tax reform, political and economic shifts, and the ongoing evolution of donor demographics are the most significant forces driving charitable giving in 2026. For Gen Z and Millennial donors, digital innovation is becoming central to trust and engagement.
More here.
Grading Foundations by Grant Making Not Size
JacI Thiede is hopeful new rating system is useful. “After graduating from Indiana University in ’91, I moved to Colorado to work for Keystone Resort. While I was there, the property management team implemented a ranking system for all rental units: Gold (the standard), Silver (pretty good), and Bronze (OK, but might need some updating). It was very easy for an employee to understand what level of quality a guest could expect from their reservation. What the Schott Foundation has created with its ranking makes it just as simple to get a clear view of a grant maker’s practices. I imagine this is a welcomed form of accountability and transparency. It won’t matter to all grant makers because some have built-in guardrails on their grants tied to mission. But overall, I support the concept and hope it proves helpful to grant makers and grant seekers!” |
Over the years, more foundations and philanthropy organizations have encouraged grant makers to provide more general operating support and flexible funding to their grantees. However, these efforts have produced mixed results. Now, a new rating system seeks to create a simple and transparent way to assess grant makers’ practices.
The ratings, called the Sustainable Grantmaking Benchmark, group foundations based on factors like the amount of general operating support and flexible funding they offer, as well as how many of their grants in recent years have been long-term, lasting three or more years, instead of single, short-term project grants.
To date, seven philanthropies—many of which focus on justice and equity—have agreed to participate in the first round of rankings. These include the California Endowment, California Wellness Foundation, Communities for Just Schools Fund, Grove Foundation, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Schott Foundation for Public Education, and Woods Fund Chicago.
More here.
We Know Atlanta Nonprofits
A Fresh Approach to Fundraising
Our services aren’t cookie cutter. We don’t operate with a boilerplate, merely changing names and locations. We craft each and every service we provide to match your organization’s unique needs, wants and abilities. We work hard and expect you to do the same. Together we can help you transform your institution, your fundraising, and the community you serve.
Whether your need is in Capital Campaign, Annual Fund Campaign, Major Gifts, Leadership Annual Giving, Planned Giving or all of the above, we take a fresh approach to nonprofit fundraising.
Sign Up for the Alexander Haas Newsletter
Get the latest on fundraising strategy, campaign insights, and nonprofit leadership – delivered straight to your inbox! Join advancement professionals nationwide who rely on Alexander Haas to stay informed and inspired.
Our Headquarters
Mailing Address
5400 Glenridge Drive, #420945
Atlanta, GA 30343