museum header

December 5, 2024

david web bioFrom the Desk of

David H. King ¦ President

What a Long Strange Trip It’s Been


I’m not much of a Grateful Dead fan, but their iconic line feels fitting as I reflect on 2024.

After a decline in giving in 2022 (according to Giving USA), I was eager to see how Giving USA 2023 would report on last year’s giving trends. The results? Giving was up slightly. BUT—and if there were an award for “Word of the Year,” I think BUT would win by a landslide—it wasn’t enough to keep pace with inflation. In simple terms, we raised more money, but that money could buy less.

As we all know, inflation over the past couple of years reached levels not seen in more than four decades. And honestly, there was no clear model to predict how this would affect charitable giving. Looking back at the 1970s for guidance on what 2024 might hold wasn’t helpful. Just think about how much has changed:

  • The smartphone in your hand today holds more computing power than almost any computer from the 1970s.
  • News took a day (or more) to reach the public.
  • Stock ownership was rare among “everyday” people.
  • Cash dominated purchases, while credit and debit cards were nearly nonexistent.

It was a fundamentally different world, making any comparisons to that era unreliable. What we do know now is that inflation impacts giving—growth in 2023 fell well below the 20-year average.

Still, inflation didn’t stop Americans from contributing generously. Sorting through the data on giving, GDP, disposable income, inflation, wage growth, and more was, frankly, mind-numbing—even for a self-proclaimed data geek like me. Despite our best efforts, we still don’t have definitive takeaways from 2023, and we may never.

Now, let’s talk about the rest of the year. Presidential election years are always “interesting,” and this one was no exception. Without fail, every election year, someone asks me whether political giving impacts philanthropic giving. Historically, the answer has been no—there’s no strong correlation. Most people seem to view political contributions and charitable donations as entirely separate activities.

BUT—yes, here’s that word again—this election cycle was unprecedented. Between the two major parties and their associated PACs, over $3 billion was raised, shattering previous records. So, what does that kind of massive political fundraising mean for philanthropy? Will it negatively affect charitable giving? On the other hand, will the stock market’s sharp rise in 2024 offset any potential impact? After all, the S&P 500‘s direction is closely correlated with charitable giving trends.

The truth is, we’ll have to wait for Giving USA 2024 to shed light on these questions. Will it provide the answers we’re looking for? I’m not sure. BUT, after the year we’ve just had, nothing would surprise me.
 

Happy Holidays and a Prosperous New Year from Alexander Haas!

Giving More and Giving Faster: Thoughts from an Arts Patron

Jorge Pérez, along with his wife, Darlene, was early to join the Giving Pledge in 2012. In an interview Pérez said he frequently speaks with his peers about giving more and faster.

“I think people have stopped taking my calls,” he joked.

He also has engaged his adult children in their philanthropy, much of which they conduct through The Miami Foundation. He said they decided to draw on the expertise of the foundation, rather than starting their own organizations, to speed along the evaluation of potential grantees.

The Pérezes, major supporters of the arts and of scholarships in Miami, donated their art collection along with cash, together worth $40 million, to the art museum, which was renamed the Pérez Art Museum Miami after the gift.

Pérez said he gives because he thinks very unequal societies are not sustainable and because he wants to leave behind a legacy.

“I keep on selling the idea that you’re giving because of very selfish reasons,” he said. “One is it makes you feel good. But two, particularly in the city or the state or the country that you’re going to live in, in the long run, this is going to make a huge difference in making our society fairer, better and more progressive and probably lead to greater economic wealth.” COP, 12-4

Americans Believe Next-Gen Giving will be Local

Americans believe the future of philanthropy is in local organizations. According to an online survey conducted by The Harris Poll on behalf of Vanguard Charitable:

  • 62% of Americans believe that the majority of future giving will be done locally.
  • 59% of Americans agree that, in the future, younger generations will be more likely than older generations to make monetary donations to nonprofit organizations that are attempting to solve large societal and environmental issues.
  • 55% of Americans believe the future of philanthropy will be women making the majority of monetary donations.
  • 68% of Americans believe that the majority of future monetary donations will be direct transfers solicited via digital platforms.
  • 58% of Millennials and 56% of Gen Z agree that, in the future, younger generations will give larger sums of money to nonprofit organizations than older generations, compared to just 39% of Gen X and 24% of Boomers.

More here. PND, 11-26

We Know Museums
For more than 35 years, Alexander Haas has been a fixture in the nonprofit community. We are honored to have worked with leading museums and cultural organizations across the country that help communities be a better place to live. Just ask our clients.

Face It: Museums are Different
Our services aren’t cookie cutter. We don’t operate with a boilerplate, merely changing names and locations. We craft each and every service we provide to match your museum’s unique needs, wants and abilities. We work hard and expect you to do the same. Together we can help you transform your museum, your fundraising, and the community you serve.

Whether your need is in Capital Campaign, Annual Fund Campaign, Major Gifts, Leadership Annual Giving, Planned Giving or all of the above, we take a fresh approach to nonprofit fundraising.